Home Networking

215 readers

1 users here now

A community to help people learn, install, set up or troubleshoot their home network equipment and solutions.

Rules

Please stay on topic.
Please use the search function to look for keywords related to what you want to ask before posting since most common issues have been answered.
No Ads. This community is for support and discussion. Ads and self promotion are not welcome here.
No product reviews or announcements. If you have a question about a product, be specific about what you want to know.
Be civil. Don't be a jerk. Not being a jerk is surprisingly easy.
No URL shorteners. URL shorteners tend to hide the real use of a link. For this reason, please use normal links, even if they're long.
No affiliate links.
No gatekeeping. With profession shall come professionalism. Extend help without judging others for their ignorance. The same goes for downvoting of comments or posts for "stupid questions" or not being as knowledgeable as others.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

No NAT November: My Month Without IPv4 (blog.infected.systems)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I found this a very interesting look at the current tools and techniques available to reduce reliance on IPv4 and NATs. While I don't foresee IPv4 going away any time soon, and I'm not sure IPv6 is an improvement per se, I do like to tinker with IPv6 in the home LAN.

(Edit: to be clear, I am not the author.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I wish I could say you were missing out, but really... You're not.

I've been lucky enough to have IPv6 dual-stack from my ISP for ... almost 10 years now. Aside from me having fun playing with it, it hasn't really improved anything. Latencies aren't noticeably any faster. It doesn't give me access to anything that isn't on the IPv4 Internet (at least nothing that I'm cool enough to know about).

Though that said, after reading this, I'm now tempted to implement some of the "mostly-IPv6" things the author tried. But again, it'd just be for fun, it won't provide me with a single benefit or capability that I have right now.