in fairness that last one did use the phrase "vast majority" to describe the number of counties that shifted to red, not the actual number of votes

I know i highlighted the difference between the two statements but i'm not expecting you to understand how statistics works or acknowledge the difference so don't strain yourself.

[–] oldbaldgrumpy 1 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

MA-JOR-ITY.

If this happened to Kamala you would be doing back flips at the gay rights parade. But it didn't. It didn't even come close. Get ready for actual common sense leadership, smaller government, and the majority of Americans being united in making America Great again.

Good things are right around the corner.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

You got a serious case of TDS

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Moving goalposts again? you've already used that twice, le sigh

"vast majority" and "majority" aren't the same, i specifically called out the vast part...but you do you.

yes, finally an lgbt dig i was losing hope at this point but i get it now, you were keeping it in reserve, i can't wait to see what you do with the immigrants, perhaps even we can hope for some drag queen action?..wait no, don't tell me, i want it to be a surprise.

a bit weak after that though

provable unlikelihood presented as fact x2 , then lie that is easily provable and contradicts your own stance ( and still fundamentally misunderstands the difference between regular and voting population )

You did get the slogan in though so some extra points for that, weird capitalisation, but close enough.

hmm, a tough call this one.....i'll give it a 6/10, a couple new bingo entries but repetition and self contradiction are fairly weak.