this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
286 points (92.1% liked)

PC Gaming

8767 readers
360 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Devs don't complain about the cut anyways. Publishers do because they're the one affected the most by the cut.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sure they do. There are solo developers out there.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes but no solo developer with a single brain cell is complaining about steam taking 30% of the cut because they know that the value steam offers them is way less than that 30% cut.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That doesn't say anything. They're not complaining, but it doesn't mean they won't benefit from Steam taking a smaller cut.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well I'd also profit if groceries wouldn't have doubled in price but we can't all have what we want.

I can only repeat myself: Paying steam 30% of your revenue is next to nothing compared to what publishers are usually taking from an indie dev.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Are all publishers like that, to all devs? You and I can't say. If all the money goes to Steam, it is a blackhole for the money. It is money that doesn't go into the development and marketing of a game.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As someone that has assisted indie developers for years, I don't think I've ever heard of a publisher that didn't borderline extort his devs except if the head of the dev studio was playing golf with the CEO of the publishing company.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Anecdotal evidence and self-contradictory. There are devs who self publish too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

AnEcDoTaL eViDeNcE

With all due respect, fuck off. Publishers have been extorting the game industry for over 2 decades and yet people like are sitting around wanting more money from them. Go shill for some CEO but stop bothering me if you don't want to see the fucking truth.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Also, whether or not all publishers are all extorting devs is up to the courts to decide. To be fair, they probably thought a class action lawsuit was better because the original lawsuit was for a publisher which was as bad as you say. All I ever said was I'm okay with the case to continue because of my thoughts that none of you hive minders really could disprove.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are games that are self-published...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I am well aware of that. But AGAIN, no dev that is self-published complains about the 30% cut because if he did all of the stuff steam does by himself he'd be paying WAY more than the 30% steam charges.