AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND
This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.
♦ ♦ ♦
RULES
① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.
② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.
③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.
④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.
⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.
Please also abide by the instance rules.
♦ ♦ ♦
Can't get enough? Visit my blog.
♦ ♦ ♦
Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.
$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.
view the rest of the comments
All positions of power can (and will) be exploited. While religion has been used to justify a lot of bad things, so has a lot of other things. Religion is also a lot of good things, like culture, philosophy and wisdom passing through generations.
It is also worth noting that you criticise religion as a whole, but all your links are about Christianity.
I point this out, because I used to be a hardcore White atheist and I had a lot of bad takes. A lot of indigenous religions do not have the same ideas about hierarchy and even the Christian idea that humans are above nature often does not exist.
Hierarchies are a bad thing in all* forms, but hierarchies are not necessary for religion.
They kinda are, though. My take is that all organised religion is bad. But what is the difference between a personal belief and a religion? It's pretty much the level of organisation. And with organisation comes hierarchies.
Uh... No? A religion is a belief system shared by many people. Organization, let alone hierarchies is optional but not at all necessary. For example as a Muslim I'd argue that at least mainstream Sunni Islam (excluding deviant groups such as Sufists) doesn't fit the Western concept of organized religion. Setting aside the merits and demerits of religion, it feels to me that discussion on this topic on English-speaking media is very eurocentric for the conclusions it attempts to reach.
to be honest Judaism isn't particularly organized either. there is no central authority past each synagogue's own rabbi and even then their "authority" is rather limited