this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
31 points (91.9% liked)

Hacker News

268 readers
545 users here now

RSS Feed of HackerNews

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can't really have an open federated protocol if you want to be able to prevent scraping ๐Ÿคท

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

the protocol might be open but joining your own server is not open so not really like the fediverse.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Weelll, depends on what you mean with "joining your own server." The model is definitely different from ActivityPub's, but lots of people on the network already have their own PDSs or "personal data servers". They do still go through Bluesky's relay, but nothing is really stopping people from running relays as such, it's just fairly costly (as in some hundreds of dollars per month) currently as they need to hold the full state and history of the network (but apparently that's being worked on.)

But it's definitely a federated protocol even though it's different from AP

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

but you kind of said yourself that in practice its not really.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right, but that doesn't mean the protocol isn't federated

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

yes but it makes federation pointless.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

So just because someone else isn't running a relay now while they figure out how to make them less costly to run, it's pointless for the protocol to be partially federated already and support further federation?