this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
157 points (76.1% liked)

Linuxsucks

239 readers
4 users here now

Rules:

  1. FOSS advocates and Linux evangelists aren't welcome. -We ask that you block us.
  2. Moderation is heavy handed. Try to stay on topic (that is LINUXSUCKS!).
  3. No Complaining Mute the sub if users, content, or rules bother you *it's ok to report rule violations

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aesthelete 1 points 1 month ago

Linux on the desktop being popular for people who don't know how to use bash shell isn't really a priority in my opinion. Canonical probably has that as something of a goal, but even they focus a lot of time and energy on Ubuntu server, which has no GUI at all.

I understand people not wanting to learn how to use a shell, but ultimately you're probably going to be dependent upon corporate software for a long time. CLIs are more expressive than a GUI ever will be.

As a developer, I have a company issued MacBook and I spend much of my time in iterm2 on it. The shell is what makes the Mac useful as a development platform. That's also the reason Windows is trying to accommodate Linux with crap like WSL, because developers basically all want a bash shell. Many of the UI developers I work with even primarily develop using a shell.