this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
57 points (95.2% liked)

China

182 readers
86 users here now

Genuine news and discussion about China

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TLDR: In recent years, as China has suffered from an economic downturn, the rate of random mass attacks has soared. After three random mass killings unfolded in Chinese coastal cities in the last two weeks, some people on social media echoed the official line of harsh punishment, while others called for freedom of expression so that people could express their grievances and the authorities could address their pain in time.

Some also suggested economic reform to boost the employment rate and policy reform, such as social welfare and labour laws, to improve working conditions. In short, people need to see hope for their future.

[...]

However, as anticipated, the Chinese authorities are fixated on their standard social control handbook. While social profiling is common in China through it's social credit system, on Weibo, many said that the Chinese Communist Party’s grassroots branches have started profiling residents into additional categories, namely, “4-without” (四無) and “5-failure” (五失).

The “4-without” are those without a spouse and children, job and regular income, normal social connections, and assets like property and cars. The “5-failure” are those who “fail” in their investments, lives, relationships, and suffer from mental illness.

**The party branches were told to pay special attention to people labelled “4-without” and “5-failure” as they are assumed to have nothing to lose, and thus might be more likely to harm society. **

However, such a measure won’t relieve the social strain. One social media user pointed out that the two social groups are victims of an unjust system and need assistance, rather than further social labels and control.

Having them screened out, and then what, put in jail? [People labelled] 4-without and 5-failure have not broken the law, and almost all of them are in need of economic assistance. The CCP does not have a comprehensive social welfare system, so how can it let these people who are in trouble get through their difficulties? The CCP keeps giving local governments money to solve their debt crisis, and it keeps pumping money into the stability maintenance system, but it is not willing to spend any money to solve the real problem! Shouldn’t the CCP know which is more effective: damming or dredging the river?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes and no.

You could do a lot of things, but I haven't heard of somebody killing 30 people or more in one incidence with a car.

And of fucking course I don't just want to take away the guns, but provide mental help, social security nets and other things which target the underlying reason.

Still doesn't change the fact that guns should not be easy to get and not be for everybody.

And additionally: Numbers are very important. Why don't we allow people to have tanks?

Edit: changed the whole comment, because for me it only showed the first link in the beginning and not the rest of your explanation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

To your first point https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Nice_truck_attack

To me and probably most people it is irrelevant what they get killed by. I dont think anyone prefers being scared to go outside because of knives over being scared to go outside because of guns. The effect is the same, the end of the belief in the social contract.