Microblog Memes

5914 readers

6492 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
Be nice.
No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

ReadyUser31

aeronmelon

1221

Self perception (slrpnk.net)

submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/microblogmemes

292 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AngryCommieKender 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Misandry is sexism

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah but none of this is misandry.

[–] AngryCommieKender 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Check the usernames. Someone that claims misandry as their identity is just spreading it.

[–] jumperalex -2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

It's possible for two things to be true at the same time. A misandrist can say something that's not misandry. And OP is not misandry.

[–] AngryCommieKender 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sure, and a MAGAt Trumper can say something that's true as well. I will still call out their shitty identity because they are the enemy of progress.

[–] jumperalex -1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Well like, that's just your opinion man.

The problem is you didn't just call out their shitty identity

Check the usernames. Someone that claims misandry as their identity,

you also tried to use it to negate their assertion

is just spreading it.

Or said another way, you made an ad hominem attack and I called you YOU out on it.

[–] AngryCommieKender 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I would absolutely rather fall victim to a debate fallacy rather than blatant bigotry. The original commentor is absolutely a bigot by their own admission, however my logical extension of their broadcasting their own bigotry doesn't necessarily fall into an ad hominem attack. All I ever said was that the original commentor was arguing in bad faith.

You absolutely did fall into an ad hominem attack by putting words in my mouth. I never attempted to negate their assertion, address their assertion, or even summarize their assertion. I simply said their assertion was made in bad faith.

[–] jumperalex 1 points 4 days ago

I simply said their assertion was made in bad faith.

And we can probably agree to disagree on that. -Cheers and enjoy your Thanksgiving (if US based of course)