this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
-1 points (47.4% liked)

Free Software

1042 readers
46 users here now

What is free software?

Free software is software that respects the 4 software freedoms. The 4 freedoms are

Please note: Free software does not relate to monetary price. Free software can be sold or gratis (no cost)

Rules:

  1. Please keep on topic
  2. Follow the Lemmy.zip rules
  3. No memes
  4. No "circle jerking" or inflammatory posts
  5. No discussion of illegal content

Please report anything you believe to violate the rules and be sure to include rhetoric on why you think it should be removed.

If you would like to contest mod actions please DM me with your rational as to why you feel that the relivant mod action should be reversed. Remember to use rhetoric and to site any relevant sources. You will only get one chance to argue your point and continued harassment will result in a ban.

Overall this community is pretty laid back and none if the things list above normally are an issue.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If you look at CVEs in Android a lot of them are tied to proprietary Qualcomm binaries. Its crazy how your GPU driver can be exploited to get root access.

If Qualcomm wasn't so dependent on their vendor kernel that ships with tons of binary blobs it would be lot more secure.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Proprietary software is not free (libre) software. Qualcomm is they only one who can actually patch there proprietary software and because the system is a black box. It is impossible to know how flawed the system could be.

[–] breadsmasher 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Your post and comments contradict each other - what are you trying to say?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

My post says that Qualcomm proprietary binaries are bad for security.

I did edit it for clarity

[–] breadsmasher 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Your title says libre software is bad for security

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You are right

I meant this as reasons to use free software but it got lost in translation

[–] breadsmasher 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Yeah what you posted is literally the opposite of what I guess you were trying to say

Its still worded as if libre software is the problem.

“Closed source proprietary software is bad for security” or something - its the fact the code is unauditable is the issue

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)