TechTakes

1435 readers

135 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

On “Safe” C++: An Odyssey of Sneers (izzys.casa)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

this post has been making the rounds on Mastodon, for good reason. it’s nominally a post about the governance and community around C++, but (without spoiling too much) it’s written as a journey packed with cathartic sneers at a number of topics and people we’ve covered here before. as a quick preview, tell me this isn’t relatable:

This is not a feel good post, and to even call it a rant would be dismissive of the absolute unending fury I am currently living through as 8+ years of absolute fucking horseshit in the C++ space comes to fruition, and if I don’t write this all as one entire post, I’m going to physically fucking explode.

fucking masterful

an important moderator note for anyone who comes here looking to tone police in the spirit of the Tech Industry Blog Social Compact: lol

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

It’s a long read, but a good one (though not a nice one).

learn about how all the people who actually make decisions in c++ world are complete assholes!
liking go (the programming language) correlated with brain damage!
in c++ world, it is ok to throw an arbitrary number of highly competent non-bros out of the window in order to keep a bro on board, even if said bro drugged and raped a minor!
the c++ module system is like a gunshot wound to the ass!
c++ leadership is delusional about memory safety!
even more assholes!

Someone on mastodon (can’t remember who right now) joked that they were expecting the c++ committee to publicly support trump, in the hopes he would retract the usg memory safety requirements. I can now believe that they might have considered that, and are probably hoping he’ll come down in their favour now that he’s coming in.

load more comments (3 replies)