Privacy

4328 readers

565 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

Be civil
No spam posting
Keep posts on-topic
No trolling

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

iopq

Why does this instance have kind of a lame data retention policy...? (self.privacy)

submitted 3 weeks ago by ComradeMiao to c/privacy

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"We will only keep your personal information for as long as it is necessary for the purposes set out in this privacy notice, unless a longer retention period is required or permitted by law (such as tax, accounting, or other legal requirements). No purpose in this notice will require us keeping your personal information for longer than the period of time in which users have an account with us.

When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize such information, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

There are a few good points in that response and a few I don't. They also concede a couple points, and complain about somebody who reposted that article (but not the original author I linked, thankfully).

To address your question: For example, sure, maybe Google does cache data but...

It's probably better to have data in two places deleted from one place (Lemmy) instead of neither place
Google allows you to specifically request removal of caches anyway
Canonizing deletion of data probably has legal and tech benefits. (I'm not a lawyer, but deletion after a reasonable retention rate probably will help server administrators more than it hurts them, and it certainly helps the users.)