this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
31 points (94.3% liked)
Hardware
984 readers
567 users here now
All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.
Rules (Click to Expand):
-
Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about
-
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
-
No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
-
Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.
-
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
-
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.
Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:
- Augmented Reality - [email protected]
- Gaming Laptops - [email protected]
- Laptops - [email protected]
- Linux Hardware - [email protected]
- Microcontrollers - [email protected]
- Monitors - [email protected]
- Raspberry Pi - [email protected]
- Retro Computing - [email protected]
- Single Board Computers - [email protected]
- Virtual Reality - [email protected]
Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Elongated Muskrat doesn't know engineering, according to those in the know. Teslas current ~~successful state~~ *lead is because of the engineering R&D set in motion by the original founders. Those ran out of steam till the model 3. The cybertruck is the product of Musk's reign, and it doesn't hold a candle to the originals.
Tesla doesn't have a recent track record of investing in thr right technology that require insight. Moreover all the strategic decisions taken by Musk at the helm haven't borne fruit: Gigafactories, camera based self driving, cybertruck's steel body.
CATL's Zeng agrees,
Musk is a sales/marketing guys larping as an engineer.
I never understood how Tesla's "Full Self Driving" marketing was legal.
I get the impression that false advertising laws are weakly enforced in the US, but this seems like an example where you can't come up even with a veneer of plausible deniability. It literally does not offer full self driving and the marketing creates serious life-threatening risks for the public.
I think you're right: it shouldn't be legal. But there's a clear underfunding/political unwillingness to prosecute big non-slam-dunk cases. Now with Trump in power that's exceedingly unlikely on a federal level.