Comic Strips

12636 readers

3407 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
The comic must be a complete story.
If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
You may post comics from others or your own.
If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
Politeness.
Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.

Web of links

[email protected]: "I use Arch btw"
[email protected]: memes (you don't say!)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

lawrence

1088

History repeats (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/comicstrips

72 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kopasz7 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Reasons are a human invention to help make sense of the world. If you want to base everything on logical grounds you will run into two things mainly:

Limits of knowledge. Knowledge is always incomplete, as more of it opens up more questions. There are things you intuitively know are good, but can't prove why they are.
Systemic limits of logical reasoning. A sufficiently powerful and consistent formal system (such as formal logic) is incomplete, it cannot prove its own correctness. (Gödel's incompleteness theorems)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, but it is better to give a valid reason, as opposed to "because", right?

[–] kopasz7 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Can you give a reason though? I guess a child haven't asked you an endless chain of whys yet. By the end of which you can't say 'why' just that 'that's how it is', you've reached the limit of knowledge.

Of course when available knowledge is preferable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Epistemologically, "that's how it is" is too declarative for that which we don't know.

Being asked an endless series of questions for me is going to end with "I don't know".

[–] kopasz7 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why don't you know?
I don't know.
Why don't you don't know why you don't know?

...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

if you really want to play this game:

that's how it is.
why is that how it is?
because that's how it is.
why is it because that's how it is?

You're in the same boat.