this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
183 points (95.1% liked)

Progressive Politics

1069 readers
789 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“On October 13, the Biden administration told Prime Minister Netanyahu that his government had 30 days to increase humanitarian aid into Gaza or face the consequences under US law, which would include cutting off military assistance,” the Massachusetts senator said in a statement shared with the Guardian.

For the first time on the issue, Warren threw her weight behind a joint resolution of disapproval, a legislative tool that enables Congress to overturn actions taken by the executive branch. Such a resolution must pass both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

She added: “The failure by the Biden administration to follow US law and to suspend arms shipments is a grave mistake that undermines American credibility worldwide. If this administration will not act, Congress must step up to enforce US law and hold the Netanyahu government accountable through a joint resolution of disapproval.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IndustryStandard 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

If I recall correctly back then she also used a few empty words so people can bring them up later to whitewash her. Remember that was 4 months into the genocide and everybody knew what was going on. A little lip service was needed. Second paragraph of the posted article states this was the first time she took action on disapproval.

For the first time on the issue, Warren threw her weight behind a joint resolution of disapproval,

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That's referring to a specific type of senate maneuver, which we all know isn't likely to even come up for a vote, not the first time she expressed disapproval or called for action. She was the first senator to call it a genocide, which I agree was way later than it should have been, but notable nonetheless, and with other progressives was critical of the invasion within the first month.

[–] IndustryStandard 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

She did pay more lip-service than most Democrats. Did she do anything actionable before like she does now?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

What actionable step would you expect her to do other than publicly call it bad and for congress to halt weapons transfers? Her only real power is in the senate and step one is rallying support with social influence.