Offbeat

1263 readers

58 users here now

The world is a weird place filled with even weirder news.

Post your funny, weird, strange, or quirky news stories here!

Lemmy.ca Rules

No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No porn.
No Ads / Spamming.

Community Rules

No editorialized titles
No satire news sites (The Beaverton, The Onion, etc...)
No politics
Submissions must be no older than 2 months (i.e. the article should be "recent" news)

Similar Communities

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

388

Costco forced to recall 80,000 lbs of butter – because the label fails to mention it contains milk (www.independent.co.uk)

submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

104 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Archive/mirror: https://archive.ph/ANMD5

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

For stuff still on the shelf, probably. For stuff already sold, no so much.

[–] BradleyUffner 3 points 2 days ago

For the stuff that's already sold, they don't have to destroy it, or do anything really, unless the customer returns it. Hardly any are going to. If the article counts those in the headline number, it's being a little dishonest.