this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
468 points (82.1% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

202 readers
103 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' etc.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
468
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by K1nsey6 to c/latestagecapitalism
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I think it was obviously insane from the start. It was clear long before 2024, before 2020 even. Offering a racist a ham sandwich isn't going to get him to vote for you when the alternative is offering him the whole pig. Campaigning that way and losing once looks like an accident. Doing it... however the fuck many times we've seen this play out now looks like it's on purpose.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Not every conservative is a racist and it isn't helpful to frame things that way. It's not unreasonable to prefer a ham sandwich to a diseased pig, and it's not unreasonable to think that's a compelling offer.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

They're either racists or willing to support and vote for racists. Not sure where you think that line of reasoning is gonna go.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

The gamble was that enough of them wouldn't support racists if given a moderate alternative. Just because it didn't work didn't mean it wasn't a reasonable strategy.