Open Source

31185 readers

208 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

241

Open-sourcing of WinAmp goes badly as owners delete entire repo (www.theregister.com)

submitted 4 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/45026885

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm completely out of the loop. What happened?

[–] [email protected] 51 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Winamp published their code as "open source". Problem is...

It wasn't open source, it was proprietary but you can see the source code.
Their custom license didn't even allow forks, which is against GitHub TOS
The codebase apparently contains proprietary code from third parties that they don't have the right to relicense.
The codebase apparently contains GPL code from third parties that they probably didn't have the right to make proprietary in the first place

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Wait, there's GPL code there as well???

I'd heard of all the others but this ome kinda snuck under the radar with all the larger issues at play here

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

The article on theregister stated

Also inside the uploaded source code was some GPL 2 source code, which renders the not-very-open WCL moot.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

On top of that, when told about the proprietary code, they deleted it from the repository thinking that was just the end if it. So they didn't have any idea how git works either.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 weeks ago

Winamp source code was published on github, but the license said you can’t fork or share the code. Such a license isn’t compatible with github, which is all about forking and sharing.