this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)
Synology
965 readers
1 users here now
Synology
This is a place for all topics regarding Synology hard- and software - especially (but not limited to) their NAS devices.
Just one thing: Let’s please be pleasant to each other and respect that people have different experience levels. Some are pros, some are noobs, yet everybody may have good ideas or interesting questions to ask and comments to make, and all of these shall be heard and appreciated. ❤️
And since we know from TV that all IT nerds 🤓 are h4xx0rs and wear hoodies all the time (if not even ski masks) in front of their computers, I chose an appropriate banner image (image credit).
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I did it the same way on my ds220+ and it worked without any problems.
So you now have 2 separate drives that are not mirrored?
That's great to hear, thank you! Now I'm wondering if I should do 2 SSD and 2 HDD or 1 SSD and 3 HDD like I originally thought.
Maybe I've misunderstood the initial question. I've put in a ssd, set up DSM, put all files on it and installed a second ssd for raid1 later.
Oh I understand. I'm trying to do something different. I want to install just one SSD, do the initial set up so DSM (and any future apps) would live on it. Then in the other 3 bays I'd add the HDDs as a second volume. A potential downside to doing this would be that if the SSD fails, the NAS would fail entirely. But I don't know enough about DSM to know if that's the case.
DSM and settings are installed on all volumes.
https://kb.synology.com/en-us/DSM/tutorial/Which_drive_is_DSM_installed_on
Thank you for this. That's helpful to know that if the SSD fails, the NAS wouldn't stop. More interested in trying this out now 🤞
You’re welcome.
I’m not sure if you’ll get a speed benefit or not since there is no way to prioritize the SSD.
My hope is that if I initialize NAS with just the SSD first, it'd have the smallest drive number, so DSM would just start off that. And maybe get some more performance if other apps/containers also ran off the SSD.
In my experience restart are infrequent. DSM runs plenty fast.
When I have a container that performs frequent small read/writes, i.e. lemmy and pictrs, I put those directories on a USB connected SSD. That greatly increased the performance of the containers I moved to that solution.
My other biggest performance boost was caching my main volume with two NVME SSDs.