this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
116 points (96.8% liked)

Uplifting News

11474 readers
28 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eheran 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

94 % of electricity... Then 77 %... Then 94 % again. Without ever saying how much solar power was actually installed to begin with.

77 % is 91 % more than than 7.7 %. How the fuck are other systems supposed to be THAT inefficient? And now, just by not having a battery and a faster system response (that the others do not need to begin with) they get to 77 %?

Is this bullshit to get money?

The system harnessed, on average, over 94% of the electrical energy generated from the system’s solar panels to produce up to 5,000 liters of water per day

On average, the system directly used 77% of the available electrical energy produced by the solar panels, which the team estimated was 91% more than traditional solar powered electro-dialysis systems.

Throughout the trial, the prototype operated under a wide range of solar conditions, harnessing over 94 percent of the solar panel’s electrical energy, on average, to directly power desalination

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, I agree that the lack of real numbers is incredibly annoying. However, 5,000 liters of water per day on solar power is pretty awesome. That could be life changing in certain areas. It might be too expensive for it to be installed in those placed, though.

[–] Eheran 2 points 1 month ago

It is only awesome if the same power could not have made 10x with the conventional systems. But who knows without absolute numbers?