this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
62 points (94.3% liked)

Business

544 readers
7 users here now

A place to share business news and insights.


Rules


  1. Follow lemmy.world rules
  2. Only post content related to business
  3. Do not use this community to promote your business

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] someguy3 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

To mitigate the impact of a second Trump presidency, Nato countries should support the creation of an allied multilateral lending institution, in practice a Nato bank, it says. This could “save nations millions on essential equipment purchases, offer low interest rates on loans to alliance members and introduce a new line of financing with longer repayment timeframes. The bank would be funded with initial subscriptions from Nato members in return for authorised capital stock”.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Nato countries should support the creation of an allied multilateral lending institution

For financing domestic improvements and improving the quality of life of residents, right?

International Arms Industry cash-register noise

Right?

[–] someguy3 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I don't remember the exact number but European Nato countries spend a lot of their military money outside Europe. They need to make their own industry and they know it.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Specifically in the US, the world's largest military exporter.

But jacking up global military spending isn't going to hurt the largest arms industry in the world.