this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
36 points (92.9% liked)

Watches

2042 readers
2 users here now

For watch enthusiasts to discuss everything related to watches and horology.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just bought the GWM 5610U-1C. It was a tough decision choosing between the DW5600 and this, ended up choosing this because the atomic time keeping is cool.

However, I'm a tad annoyed that the time doesn't perfectly match with time.gov and time.is since the atomic sync doesn't account for time propagation, so there's like a fraction of a second delay that's noticeable. Other than that, the watch is fantastic and has most features I would want. (I wish it had barometer and altimeter stuff, maybe even compass, and dive rated so I can press buttons underwater)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Your computer meanwhile theoretically does, it runs through God knows many nodes, bounced around until it finally gets back to you. I guess they could try to establish your location and correct, but eh....

NTP accounts for latency.

NTP is actually pretty interesting, here is a computerphile video explaining it: https://youtu.be/BAo5C2qbLq8

I wouldn't trust a cheap radio controlled wristwatch more than a NTP synced computer that's synced to a good NTP server.

P.S I have the same watch and it does sync pretty damn well with time.is