Microblog Memes

6016 readers

3543 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
Be nice.
No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

ReadyUser31

aeronmelon

1695

oh no! think of the stock market! (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by vinyl to c/microblogmemes

402 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] dubious 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

it's long past time we took businessman out of control and replaced them with scientists.

[–] Argonne 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

In which case they would choose Nuclear over Solar 9/10 times. I'm onboard

[–] Crashumbc 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They would probably use nuclear for base load, until something better is found. But it won't "replace" solar.

[–] Argonne 1 points 2 months ago

With AI we will need loads of base load

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Nuclear has few advantages over solar.

Solar + batteries.

Image from this article

~$1000/kW vs $6 - 10,000/kW in 2018, it is cheaper today; projected costs to drop to as low as $560/kW in 2050.

Add in the ~$150/kWh of grid scale storage with the associated switchgear to connect it to the grid.

For a 10MW + 20MWh solar system; you are looking at approx $13,000,000 + install costs of probably $2-3,000,000.

[–] Cryophilia 4 points 2 months ago

I'm on board with whatever the scientists conclude. I'm not a scientist, so if they say nuclear, I'm behind nuclear. If they say solar, I'm behind solar. If they say wind, I'm behind wind. Trust scientists. If you're trained in science, definitely verify - there's some bad science out there for sure. But if you have no expertise in the area, just trust the scientific community.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

This might not be the case anymore, now that solar is dirt cheap.

But, as another commenter said, I'm onboard with any decision that scientists (including both energy and climate sciences) and engineers come up with working together.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't know a single who would, including myself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do you like... have an allergy to good ideas?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The down voters and you should maybe reread my comment and the one I replied to... Sorry to burst your bubble.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I did, it looks like an illogical dislike of nuclear. Not sure if it's ignorance or just an emotional response but you might want to do some research. A lot of people don't like things they don't understand.