Palestine

843 readers

1 users here now

A community to discuss everything Palestine.

Rules:

Posts can be in Arabic or English.
Please add a flair in the title of every post. Example: “[News] Israel annexes the West Bank ”, “[Culture] Musakhan is the nicest food in the world!”, “[Question] How many Palestinians live in Jordan?”

List of flairs: [News] [Culture] [Discussion] [Question] [Request] [Guide]

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

U.N. Chief Barred from Entering Israel (www.newsweek.com)

submitted 1 month ago by Linkerbaan to c/[email protected]

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Israel's foreign minister announced Wednesday that U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres has been declared "persona non grata" and barred from entering Israel.

Foreign Minister Israel Katz accused Guterres of bias, citing his failure to condemn Iran's recent attack on Israel.

"Anyone who cannot unequivocally condemn Iran's heinous attack on Israel does not deserve to step foot on Israeli soil."

"This is an Israel-hating Secretary-General, who gives support to terrorists," he said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Much logic. "Not condemning" = "Celebrating" apparently. If i see two drunk people beat each other up, then im not gonna publicly condemn either of them, but that doesnt mean i think that either of them are doing something good. If he had to condemn every attack from both sides all the time, he wouldnt be able to work at all. Maybe thats the goal here. Preventing the UN from doing its job.

[–] Linkerbaan 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Iran also only targeted military sites yesterday, which is completely in line with international law. As long as they don't target population centers there's no reason to condemn it.

[–] Potatisen 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure this whole thing is made as a way to discredit organisations, UN or otherwise, who are even slightly against the mess going on over there.

[–] AstridWipenaugh 6 points 1 month ago

Yep, it's the classic "if you're not with us, you're against us" stance meant to threaten everyone into being complicit in your atrocities.

load more comments (1 replies)