this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
315 points (96.2% liked)

A Comm for Historymemes

1506 readers
683 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

In their defense, birth order rarely correlated with their name - Decimus could just as easily be a firstborn child, or the fifth son.

This is something, I find more weird than defending. Or, in other words, TIL Romans were bad at counting.

[–] PugJesus 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Well, at least you don't have a Primus in every family that way!

Or, in other words, TIL Romans were bad at counting.

lmao, there are other examples of Roman weirdness with numbers. For most of the Republic period, the year was expressed not by a number, but by which two consuls were elected that year. Ab Urbe Condita (AUC, 'From the founding of the city') was much more rare. "Draw 25 or use numbers like normal human beings."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I know about the way Romans counted time. Isn't also in the Bible, the year Jesus was born given as the year x of the reign of Augustus? Later, the pope who established the AD counting had lots of struggle summing up all the years of the emperors without counting some years twice.

[–] wanderer 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Isn’t also in the Bible, the year Jesus was born given as the year x of the reign of Augustus?

No, it isn't. Descriptions of when he was born are vague and contradictory.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Indeed, e.g. the text of the Lukas Evangelium isn't that precise as I've thought I remember it.

[–] PugJesus 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yep! In the Empire, there were often numerous consuls in a year instead of just two (being rotated out as a kind of 'gift' from the Emperor) so the norm for counting the year changed to how many years since the ruling Emperor came into power.

Funny how some things we take for granted, like an unborked date system, are actually innovations, and far from timeless (ha).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

TY, I didn't know, there were still consules in the Roman Empire.
Yes, a continuous calendar system makes things a lot easier.

[–] trolololol 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Of course they were. I give you proof they're even worse at math. Tell me quick, how much is

CMDIV + CCDDVIII

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

You actually needed to be 'very good' at math to fluently calculate with Roman numbers. However, I can't make sense of your examples.