this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
23 points (84.8% liked)
Legal News
274 readers
354 users here now
International and local legal news.
Basic rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flag
Some cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules apply
All lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm having a hard time being mad at Mozilla for this kind of thing. Which privacy minded person installs an application and doesn't go through the settings to find all of the privacy minded features and disables those they don't agree with? Do we not "Trust but verify" all the things because of these kinds of options that pop up? Who is at fault here, the application or the user?
We, as users, need to start taking our own settings on our systems more seriously and stop dumping all of our responsibility into the hands of someone else. Go through the settings of your apps. Save them so you can get to them when needed. Disable everything you can or want. Don't trust it until you've done the necessary research and tested it for yourself.
That's the fallacy. You assume all Firefox users are privacy minded. Which is idealistic, not a reality. From Firefox being pre-installed on Linux to Mozilla themselves marketing it the opposite way.
There is no universe where opt-out tracking is not abusive behavior. Literally, read the Mozilla blog and see how they used to condemn this same behavior before.