this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
1174 points (98.0% liked)

People Twitter

5367 readers
1330 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dkarma 124 points 2 months ago (52 children)

This pervasive selfishness in older generations sickens and astounds me.

Imagine not wanting to give your kids everything.

I would forego food if I had to in order to help my kids see better.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (43 children)

I would forego food to make sure my kids had glasses or contacts, sure.

I would not forego food so they could have elective surgery.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

An elective surgery you call it, an investment in their vision, I call it. Not everyone has vision as part of their insurance, and contacts/glasses/exams can get expensive without (or even with, depending on the policy). Viewed in that way, LASIK can definitely be seen as an investment.

[–] MotoAsh 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, lasik comes with issues down the road if you go for the cheaper procedures, and even the good ones if you have complications.

If the question is money, adding risk is often not the wisest of decisions...

[–] SchmidtGenetics 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The same can be said for glasses and contacts too. So you have a pay once and done, or a pay forever with the same potential issues. Very few people’s vision ever get better from continual glass contact use, but it can get better permanently from lasik.

load more comments (40 replies)
load more comments (48 replies)