Cybersecurity

5648 readers

110 users here now

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
No Ads / Spamming.
No pornography.

Community Rules

Idk, keep it semi-professional?
Nothing illegal. We're all ethical here.
Rules will be added/redefined as necessary.

If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Notable mention to [email protected]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Why Pay A Pentester? (thehackernews.com)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

What do you guys think? I don't think there's a lot of depth to the arguments, myself. It reads more like an threadbare op-ed with a provocative title. But I'd like to hear you opinions on the impact of automated testing solutions on the role of pen-testers in the industry.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I do QA Automation for a large software company. We still have manual QA testing, because it's costly and sometimes impossible to automate everything.

Also, there is no scenario where you can automate everything until you can automate social engineering. It's why scammers don't bother trying to hack your bank but instead try to get you to buy $2000 in Applebee's gift cards to settle "an IRS debt that you need to fix RIGHT NOW!"