this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
165 points (95.1% liked)
Progressive Politics
1057 readers
1313 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's not "the goods."
That comes out during trial, unless by whistleblower, you meant that you hope someone inside the investigation leaks details to the press? I'm not judging, just looking for clarification.
Whistleblowers come forward to trigger a response that they feel is lacking or inadequate, typically administrative, legal, or political in nature.
As there are multiple active DOJ investigations, what you have now are cooperating witnesses, and subjects with plea agreements.
Both of which include the "goods", but neither are allowed to talk to the press.
FWIW I'm also very much looking forward to reading the accounts of the hilariously dumb acts of corruption acts these morons got up to.
I doubt very much they'll file charges on all but slam-dunks, and may negotiate pretrial plea deals. And whistleblowers coming forth right now may very well jeopardize any pending charges, so good catch. It just bothers me that everyone affected may not see real justice, that's all I mean.