this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
534 points (98.9% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

5229 readers
1 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [[email protected]](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: [email protected] [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/1078917

According to reports, producers expect writers will run out of money, possibly lose their homes and be forced to come to bargaining table. Producers denied these reports.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheAndrewBrown 41 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The writer’s strike probably still won’t be really felt for a while, but this will have an immediate effect. No press junkets, no premieres, no conventions, etc.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Conventions are still happening, but actors can only talk about old work, nothing active. That makes sense, but curious if actors will just refuse to go altogether. Would be wild for SDCC to become an actual comic book convention again.

Edit: Maybe not? I've seen conflicting sources on that.

[–] TheAndrewBrown 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The linked article says “During the strike, actors will not be permitted to promote past projects through conventions, interviews or panels.” That seems to me like they can’t promote anything they’ve acted in, no matter how old.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Odd, I read the opposite somewhere else but perhaps that's wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)