this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
188 points (98.0% liked)

Fediverse

28383 readers
1135 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
188
Map of 2000+ lemmy communities (danterious.codeberg.page)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/fediverse
 

This is my first try at creating a map of lemmy. I based it on the overlap of commentors that visited certain communities.

I only used communities that were on the top 35 active instances for the past month and limited the comments to go back to a maximum of August 1 2024 (sometimes shorter if I got an invalid response.)

I scaled it so it was based on percentage of comments made by a commentor in that community.

Here is the code for the crawler and data that was used to make the map:

https://codeberg.org/danterious/Lemmy_map

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] finitebanjo 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

So more dots means more activity total for that communities users on any community in the top 35?

Wouldn't a bar graph be sufficient?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

For example most of the red dots to the top right are nsfw communities and it was able to clump like that because the people that comment in those communities tend to comment in the other nsfw communities as well.

edit: left -> right

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] finitebanjo 8 points 2 months ago

Ah cool, self segregating proximity map. The format makes more sense with this explanation, thank you.

load more comments (3 replies)