this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
66 points (92.3% liked)

Python

1914 readers
8 users here now

A community for talking about the Python programming language.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Python has (optional) types now.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

The problem with optional typing is that it has all the downsides of both but gives you very little of the advantages of a strong static type system, e.g. being able to rely on types catching certain kinds of errors when refactoring because you don't know for sure that all APIs have types. It is really nothing more than an admission by dynamically typed languages that static types are so useful you can't really do without them while at the same time not admitting that it might be best to move to a language and library ecosystem that was designed with static types from the start.