this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
4 points (75.0% liked)

Israel and Palestine Politics Discussion

330 readers
10 users here now

The sole purpose of this community is to discuss Israeli and Palestinian issues. It is not the place for hurling insults, rehashing grudges, or making up history. Any conversation that veers into the "if only your people had" realm will be deleted or locked right away. I started this community in the potentially fruitless hope that we may have a civil conversation about this issue.

Rules:

  1. References to historical events must include a reputable source. The definition of reputable is up to the mods. Keep that in mind.
  2. Articles from reputable sources only.
  3. No name-calling. That's what DMs are for. /s
  4. Keep it in English. If I don't understand the word, it gets removed. Obvious exceptions would be the use of proper names and references. For example, "wadi" when used to refer to a place is acceptable.
  5. Discussions that are heading into the probability of becoming a flame war will be locked.
  6. Repeat offenders will be forced to find another community.
  7. Anti-Zionism is ok. Anti-Semitism is not.
  8. Whataboutism is for toddlers. Try to grow up.
  9. Posting articles about current events is encouraged. Posting the same story from 20 different sources is not.
  10. Posting an article purely for the purpose of saying "Look what monsters they are" is discouraged unless it can generate an honest discussion. This is probably the most difficult rule to follow.
  11. No calling anyone a terrorist.
  12. No YouTube links. Some of us can read.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
DevCat
4
How would you have drawn the 1947 partition plan? (self.israel_palestine_pol)
submitted 1 year ago by Zstom6IP to c/israel_palestine_pol
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

We all know how the real plan looked, but what would you have changed, or how would you have made it if you had to draw it? (answers like no partition, or one state do not count, this is a question specific to how you would design or modify the 1947 plan)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DevCat 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The most common answer, that of giving pockets of majority this or that their own area if they are of a certain minimum size, wouldn't have worked then. The majority of the Jews were in the cities, and you can't split a city.

The best plan would have been to divide up the entire territory, so there would be sufficient resources for each group to remain sustainable, but carving out Jerusalem as something like Vatican City, and administered as a World Heritage Site. The issue with a division based upon resources, though, is there were no good surveys done at the time as to what kinds of resources there were and what future growth would do. Look at the Jordan River and the Dead Sea. The Jordan is but a trickle when it reaches the Dead Sea, and the Sea itself is shrinking almost daily.

Climate change may make any division of the land moot as the area continues to dry out, and it makes human habitation unfeasible. The inland areas, namely Palestine, will feel those effects first and probably exacerbate the situation.

[–] Zstom6IP 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

so what would you have changed about it?

[–] DevCat 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't believe any partitioning scheme would have survived the interests of that time, or those that came to power over the next decade. This includes government, as well as terrorist/freedom fighter groups.

[–] Zstom6IP 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree, but how would you have changed the preposed map?

[–] DevCat 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't believe any map would have worked out as it relies upon artificial, imposed from outside borders. The only borders that have ever worked are the ones that have been agreed upon over generations by the inhabitants themselves.

[–] Zstom6IP 1 points 1 year ago

I know that is the case, this is purely a thought experiment.