this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
285 points (87.6% liked)

World News

32501 readers
933 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In her first interview as the Democratic presidential nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris told CNN it was imperative to reach a ceasefire deal in Gaza, but made it clear that she would not alter President Joe Biden’s policy in the region.

However, when pressed on whether she would stop sending weapons to Israel she told Bash, “No, we have to get a deal done, Dana. We have to get a deal done.”

“Adopting an arms embargo against Israel’s assault on Gaza is not only a moral imperative but also a strategic move to defeat Trump and MAGA extremism. It is difficult for the Democratic candidate to champion democracy while arming Netanyahu’s authoritarian regime” reads a recent letter to Harris from the coalition Not Another Bomb.

Recent polling has repeatedly demonstrated that Democratic voters overwhelmingly support the conditioning of U.S. military aid. A Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) survey from March found that 52% of Americans want the U.S. to halt weapons shipments to Israel in order to force a ceasefire. 62% of Biden voters said “The US should stop weapons shipments to Israel until Israel discontinues its attacks on the people of Gaza,” while only 14% disagreed with the statement.

The numbers from a June CBS News poll were even higher, with more than 60% of all voters and almost 80% of Democrats saying the U.S. shouldn’t send Israel weapons.

“The real question should have been, ‘When are you going to start enforcing U.S. law as it relates to arms shipments’ because what we are doing right now, with this United States policy, is in violation of not just international law, but also of American law, “said the Arab Center’s Yousef Munayyer in an interview with Democracy Now in response to the CNN segment. “Vice-President Harris made it clear in other parts of her interview that she wants to be a prosecutor. She wants to enforce the law, but Israel is clearly getting an exception from the Harris campaign.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Clearly the most efficient way to stop this genocide is to wait until all the Palestinians have been murdered. Then no more can be murdered. Thus no more genocide. Obviously you just don't understand the complexities of the situation. It's the only way to ensure the genocide stops!

I fucking hate myself for knowing that I'll be voting for her. Jesus

[–] distantsounds 10 points 3 months ago

iT,s ok bEcAUse it’S tHe oNLy sAfE pOrT iN the aReA!!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

There’s always my boy Vermin!

[–] III 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I would hate myself voting for or not voting against a candidate who will only increase support for genocide.

I understand your frustration with the Harris option but am glad you are willing to still vote. So many others seem be happy allowing things to become worse just because they can't make it better, which is an even less moral response.

[–] sandbox 1 points 3 months ago

You have more choices beyond voting for either Trump or Harris.

[–] TokenBoomer 1 points 3 months ago

Don’t hate yourself. It’s not your fault, it’s theirs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Then don't vote for her, It's very simple. If you keep rewarding politicians for bad behavior, that behavior never gets better. It's like giving a dog a cookie every time it pisses on the floor. The dog assumes that you want it to piss on the floor.