Sub.club thinks premium feeds could also serve other use cases, like supporting helpful bots or generating funds to help maintain a community's Mastodon server, for instance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I mean, how else do you expect things to work? Internet platforms aren't free to operate. Isn't paying creators directly supposed to be the ideal solution, instead of infesting pages with ads?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

You're already free to support developers and instance owners financially if they've set up either Patreon, OpenCollective or LiberaPay 🤷 That's money going where it's needed.

If I understand SubClub correctly, it's monetisation on a user level, which in the past has only really given us influencers. I rather enjoy not having that kind of bullshit on the fediverse.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what the difference between SubClub or Patreon is supposed to be. Other than SubClub takes a smaller cut.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

That's exactly what I thought when I first saw this. The difference in that they market it as a fediverse extension.

load more comments (1 replies)