this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
516 points (99.2% liked)

HistoryPorn

4972 readers
9 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  9. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] IMALlama 40 points 3 months ago (2 children)

More historic info: https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/japan-soba-noodle-delivery-men

This picture is probably an exaggeration, but is partially grounded in reality.

India's Dabbawala is somewhat similar - one person carries a massive quantity of food. https://feedr.co/en-gb/c/blog/the-amazing-dabbawalas-of-mumbai

[โ€“] sga 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

this is a lot more believable for 2 reasons - I have seen them (not in person, but you get the point), and they have this base, in which all the tiffins(lunchboxes) are kept, so all this essentially acts as a very large single body, unlike noodle carrier, who had them all in a vertical - stacked setup, with the dabbawala setup, the center of gravity is much easier to be aligned across their head, but with noodle guy, that is genuinely hard, even balancing one long stick that way would be hard, it would just tip over, although in motion it would be comparatively more stabler

load more comments (1 replies)