this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
22 points (100.0% liked)

History

21 readers
1 users here now

This is the general history subcom. Anything relating to history is welcome here. Doesn't have to be Marxist, though it certainly can be. So join in on the discussion and let's learn more.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

alt link if it doesn't work.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

To put it in the context though, it was written during the probably late part of Three Kingdoms period when China wasn't exactly united and prosperous after decades of civil war.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This was also quite possibly written during the crisis of the third century for Rome, where portions of the empire had broken off and they were fractured, so describing it as having many "minor kings" wouldn't have been too inaccurate for the time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True, though i wouldn't really say there were "many" minor kings, but the distance and info being likely filtered through sources from Sassanid empire which was on the rise during the Shapur reign, influenced that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

A lot of China's interpretations of Rome came through the various empires in between the two, and those various empires make a killing as middlemen along the silk road, so I think you're onto something there.