this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
1954 points (98.5% liked)

memes

10342 readers
2428 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

If I recall, Disney Springs is outside of the parks, basically an outside mall-type area with a bunch of third-party shops and restaurants. Disney is plenty evil, but they're just the landlord in this situation.

[–] bitwaba 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A landlord that owns a streaming service who tries to argue that usage of that streaming service allows them to not be sued by fucking up your food order.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

Their other legal argument made more sense... They have nothing to do with food preparation done by one of the tenants.

[–] TheEhHole 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And I can't think of many things more evil than a landlord

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I have less issues with landlords with commercial tenants... A lot of retailers do not want to own real estate or maintain properties. Residential landlords, on the other hand...

[–] piecat 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I don't know any other landlords that advertise and vouch their clients on their website.

I bet cafeterias or food courts have gotten sued for the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You don't? The malls, outlets, and high-end shopping centers around here certainly maintain a website as well as signage for their tenants.

If someone stopped at a Rest Stop and Baskin Robins errantly put tree nuts in their dish, I don't of any legal precident making the Rest Stop owner liable.

[–] piecat 3 points 2 months ago

It's the fact they vouched for the resturaunt.

I don't mean having a sign or directory. I mean saying specifically "the BR at our rest stop is allergy friendly" vs "our rest stop has a basken robbins, check their page for details"