this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
187 points (84.8% liked)

Work Reform

10011 readers
428 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Are the same petty mods running this show? If so, please ban me immediately. I don't see how you can reconcile claiming to fight labor exploitation while at the same time giving away your labor for free to a billion dollar company.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DrTautology 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Fair enough. Officially I was banned for making a post that violated the subs rules, which I never did. In reality I was banned because a mod didn't like my attitude. I made a post asking about union materials, but I noticed that the post never went up, so I sent a mod mail asking if there was something wrong with my post. What I got back was a snarky remark about the mods not being bots and they have to manually approve every post and how dare I ask that question again and waste their precious time. To my surprise I made a post about a year ago and it didn't get approved after 7 hours so I sent a similar inquiry. Naturally I had completely forgotten about this interaction, so I thank the mod for being petty enough to look it up and mention it. Basically a case of give snark get snark, and they didn't like it and decided to power trip. That's the whole story.

[–] Galluf -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you for being honest enough to admit your title is a lie.

Next time be honest from the beginning and don't lie in your title.

[–] DrTautology 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did you read what wrote? I was permanently banned and my post was removed because they said it violated the sub's rules, which it didn't. That's officially why I was banned. I didn't lie about anything here.

[–] Galluf -1 points 1 year ago

I'd consider it a lie to say you were supposedly banned for violating a rule when you yourself acknowledged that you know that's not the reason you were banned.

You could have included a qualifier such as supposedly or ostensibly and then explained the full context up front.