this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
159 points (100.0% liked)

BrainWorms

1251 readers
77 users here now

Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.

This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://dubvee.org/post/1735883

The Department of Justice has amended its antitrust lawsuit against Ticketmaster and Live Nation, alleging that Ticketmaster's introduction of nontransferable tickets and the SafeTix system was primarily intended to stifle competition from rival platforms like StubHub and SeatGeek, rather than merely to reduce ticket fraud. "The complaint, which was amended on Monday after 10 states joined the DOJ's lawsuit, cites internal Ticketmaster documents obtained during the legal process," notes The Verge. From the report:

In 2019, Ticketmaster rolled out SafeTix, which replaced static barcodes on electronic tickets with encrypted barcodes that refresh every 15 seconds. Ticketmaster marketed SafeTix as a way of reducing ticket fraud, but the complaint claims reducing competition was âoea primary motivationâ for the new ticketing system. [...] The amended complaint includes new information about Ticketmaster's dominance of the events market. One internal Live Nation document cited in the complaint notes that Ticketmaster is the primary ticketer for approximately 80 percent of arenas across the country that host NBA or NHL teams. As of 2022, Live Nation-promoted events accounted for 70 percent of all amphitheater shows across the country, according to internal Live Nation events mentioned in the complaint.

The DOJ alleges that because of Ticketmaster's conduct, consumers have âoepaid more and continue to pay more for fees relating to tickets to live events than they would have paid in a free and open competitive market.â The exact amount of monetary harm is still unknown, the complaint claims, and will require discovery from Ticketmaster and Live Nation's books, as well as from its third-party competitors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] count_dongulus 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (11 children)

I actually feel like the safetix thing was a good way to combat scalping. Sucks that the tickets are still expensive and a lot of the money goes to TicketMaster, but it's not the technology causing the high prices. Venues need to step up and tell TicketMaster to suck it when TicketMaster wants them to be the exclusive ticket distributor.

[–] jumjummy 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Exactly. Tickets should always be non-transferable with some minor exceptions. Fuck Ticketmaster, it fuck scalpers even more. They add nothing to the ticket buying process other than increasing costs.

Almost like car salesmen.

[–] SirDerpy 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Because some corporation is abusing scalping you propose we can no longer sell what we own.

I suggest we kill the corporation and keep our rights.

[–] curse_of_yig 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes, 100%

Ticket master isn't responsible for tickets selling out immidiately and prices going up 100-1000% on stubhub. Scalpers are responsible for that. The only way to eradicate that market is to force tickets to be non transferable. And it's not even a novel concept. There's plenty of things you cant resell.

[–] SirDerpy 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Corporate scalpers. A corporation holding venues hostage for ticket sales. These aren't humans. Limit the rights of the corporations fucking over humans instead of the humans. It's not a novel concept, over 150 years since it was explained at length.

load more comments (7 replies)