this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
1310 points (98.4% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5650 readers
470 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MadBigote 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I would call that fanaticism over nationalism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It really depends on what definition of nationalism you're using, absolutely. Original usage of "nationalism" had its meaning much closer to "patriotism", the older of the two words, but usage over time has separated their definitions (again, dependant on where you are in the world).

In america "nationalism" is more often associated with 'white nationalism' and even when not explicitly tied to the white nationalist movement, 'nationalism' at best carries with it a negative connotation. "Nationalism" in the States means patriotism, but an exclusive sort which puts the rest of the world beneath the needs of America, even the basic needs of a given country's right to self-determination if it goes against the US's interests, which dovetails nicely with your definition of fanaticism

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

As another example: In the context of 19th century "Germany", the "nationalist movement" refers to the unification movement, so a "nationalist" was just a person who wanted the many german countries to become a single nation-state.