this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
37 points (100.0% liked)

Dallas-Fort Worth

579 readers
1 users here now

DFW is a home for discussion and content related to the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex. We strive to be a friendly and welcoming community to all of our users whether they are longtime residents of DFW, newcomers, curious Lemmers, or just visiting. Howdy y'all.

Don't miss : c/Texas

Sister City Communities:

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jake_jake_jake_ 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

while this is completely true in a lot of places, i also have never heard of this specific technology, which could help the ever increasing heat problem elsewhere if used in combination with sane urban planning, especially other improvements in regards to heat.

[–] TheTechnician27 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

At a stated $330,000 per mile, there are almost assuredly better measures than this dollar for dollar in most places. This makes sense in a city as comically car-dependent as Dallas and in such a hot climate, but realistically, that $330,000 could be better spent elsewhere toward fighting temperatures if a city actually wanted to do something about city temperatures and global warming as a whole.

It's just that those things would involve actually improving the city to the detriment of NIMBY drivers.

[–] PopOfAfrica 7 points 5 months ago

Heck, even green spaces lower overall temperatures.