this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
535 points (98.4% liked)

Uplifting News

11499 readers
803 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 112 points 3 months ago (2 children)

While we're at it, can be ban AI generated product reviews and comparisons? That would be rad.

[–] IHawkMike 98 points 3 months ago (1 children)

First sentence, emphasis mine:

The Federal Trade Commission on Wednesday voted unanimously to ban marketers from using fake reviews, such as those generated with AI technology, and other misleading practices to promote their products and services.

Just being cheeky though. I don't always read the articles either. But Lina Kahn has been on fire lately.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I read the article, but I more took it as line item reviews from the likes of Amazon, Yelp, Google, etc. It didn't seem like they were targeting product writeups and comparisons from unaffiliated third party websites.

[–] IHawkMike 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I get what you mean now. The SEO spamming AI garbage sites predate LLMs and are one of the worst things about the modern web. It's a legitimately necessary skill to identify and filter them out. I actually think they probably contributed to some of reddit's recent rise since everyone started adding "reddit" to their queries just to bypass that garbage.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Exactly. It used to be easy enough to spot that spam, but it's like damn near anything involving a given product is sponsored content/AI-generated junk and it's a royal pain sifting through them to do legit research before plunking down a decent chunk of money on something.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Fake reviews sure, but what does comparisons have to do with it? Sounds like a perfect use for an LLM to compare two different product description pages.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nah fuck that. If I'm seeking out detailed comparisons, I'd rather real world reports from an enthusiast or someone knowledgeable in the field. I'm not talking just comparing side-by-side specs, I can do that with two browser windows myself. The problem is that you'll find these reports, but they're absolute drivel written either by machine that has no idea what the hell it's talking about, or a sponsored content "article" written by some yoyo that's clearly being paid to promote one product over the other.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

I find the AI summaries of reviews Amazon does on product pages to be fairly inoffensive and generally a decent use of AI.

But it's also clearly marked as auto-generated.