Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
No, the official publication said they did NOT endorse Trump.
The Neo-Nazis did officially endorse Biden.
The official publication said they did not endorse Trump. It’s in the article I cited and cited a second time to you.
When you have to split hairs like this do you really think you're on the right side of history?
It isn’t splitting hairs. The Neo-Nazis endorsed Biden. They actually did endorse Biden.
Biden actually has ties to the kkk.
Remember the whole racial jungle? I am on the right side of history.
A candidate can’t help who endorses them. Both Biden and Trump rejected their support.
Read the article I posted; the author of the article in the newspaper specifically said he did not endorse Trump.
I am not sure why you get confused so easily.
I did, and it is wrong. They can't contradict the original source. That is an opinion vs fact. Their opinion is incorrect because the AUTHOR (Primary Source) stated he did not endorse Trump.