this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
1557 points (99.1% liked)

People Twitter

5375 readers
1700 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1557
Unbelievable (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Do those socialist policies not rely on defensive violence as well?

Well, the idea to provide free housing rather than policing the unhoused certainly didn't.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm referring to how you were saying they could replace police.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The book stipulates that providing free housing would reduce crime committed by people who are unhoused. It also advocates for free health care for people and social workers for people who suffer from mental illness. Some will refuse treatment, as we already know. But not all. The book does not say that crime will end. It does make ten (I think) excellent points as a chapter each about failures of policing to address social problems. And it has damning statistics to back up the claims.

It's ridiculous that the richest nation in human history refuses to spend money on people in need other than for the purposes of enforcement. Doing so is counterproductive and wastes more money than just helping people. That's my take.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I understand what you're saying about building better systems. But how do you expect any system to uphold the law without violence? What do you do about the crime that persists?