this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
705 points (96.1% liked)

World News

39123 readers
2924 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

On July 25, after a couple of months of debate, the Wikipedia entry "Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Israeli attack on Gaza" was changed to "Gaza genocide." This was done despite the fact that the International Court of Justice in the Hague has not made an official ruling on the matter, in the wake of South Africa's petition to the court alleging that Israel is committing or facilitating genocide in Gaza.

The Los Angeles-based Jewish Journal, which followed the Wikipedia discussion and vote, wrote that the editors who voted on this change claimed to be relying on an academic consensus based on statements of experts on genocide, human rights, human rights law and Holocaust historians.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

curious, i'm not jewish, how could i be a zionist?

ethno-nationalist maybe, but i'm not one of those either, i'm generally opposed to ethnostates.

also, am i gross? Or did i just say something gross? Weird implication there.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

curious, i'm not jewish, how could i be a zionist?

Oh wow it's super fucking rare for someone to just admit that they've got no idea what they're talking about like that.

If you legitimately think being Jewish is a requirement to be a zionist then you're so I'll informed on the topic at hand that it's actually pathetic.

also, am i gross?

Yes. Your views are gross, so I find you gross.

There's no implication at all, I directly stated what you are. Work on your understanding of the language, it's shit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Oh wow it’s super fucking rare for someone to just admit that they’ve got no idea what they’re talking about like that.

well considering that zionism is a concept relating specifically to judaism, it seems fair to me to assume that it would be mostly jewish people that primarily care about it.

My family is historically christian, but i'm not a pastor or anything so any deeper lore is lost on me.

If you legitimately think being Jewish is a requirement to be a zionist then you’re so I’ll informed on the topic at hand that it’s actually pathetic.

i don't think it's a requirement, probably just a heavy predisposition. As a non religious individual myself i have no reason to care for zionism one way or the other. I also don't think i mentioned anything specifically about zionism in my original post, so im not even sure why i'm being called a zionist.

Yes. Your views are gross, so I find you gross.

all of them? Or just these ones specifically.

[–] jordanlund 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Their comment was removed for civility, but to answer your question, many American evangelicals are Zionist because they feel the Holy land has to be in Jewish hands for Jesus to come back.

It's not a rational belief, but then, religion is rarely rational.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

yeah, that's a possibility. I know israel exists under the concept that in order for jews to be safe it has to be it's own ethnostate with the ability to protect itself militarily, which is definitely one of the answers after the events of the holocaust. Or so i've heard.

appreciate the answer though.