this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
110 points (97.4% liked)
Open Source
31654 readers
245 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
While I respect the decision the dude made, anyone should always be able to back out of an open source project, I also absolutely do not understand the reasoning.
The markdown challenge was in no way a ranking of how good or bad Lemmy apps are. It just said, "hey look, this type of formatting isn't shown correctly in some apps".
How did the dev even deal with other bug reports? If other stuff didn't work correctly, how was that then not a "bad reputation" for him? I am totally confused by this.
from de goodbye post by the dev of Raccoon for Lemmy:
App was being judged for the 3rd party library that was implemented
Your question:
Very well, it was faster than The Concorde, everyone that ever contacted him can confirm that right away
The last part is the most sad part, I felt he really loved working on it. It must have felt like cutting off an arm for him to let it go.
I can confirm that it felt more or less like that 😓
do they think only bad devs create bugs? it's part of programming.
The reputation argument is so weird to me, it's free work for no compensation, to experiment and learn new things. That's personal development and going beyond doing the minimum (of not making an app at all), that's usually good reputation points.
Unless the code is in really bad shape, it's just unfinished which is very understandable given it's free software made in free time. One could make the argument they were likely properly prioritizing their day job as well.
I have my share of unfinished of abandoned projects and it never even once came up in an interview. And when I'm the interviewer, I'm more interested in why they started it, and what they learned from it, what they would have done differently, why did they want to use X and Y libraries for it and so on. I have much worse apps in the Play Store right now from places I worked at 10 years ago.
They deleted everything so I can't go check but there might be some cultural factors at play there to explain this.
As an aside, the app I use (Boost) also scored fairly bad on that test. I still paid for it and still use it. Sure it doesn't display everything perfectly but Markdown is literally designed to be readable before rendering, you still get the message.
It's such a weird thing to flip out on and delete everything for. A simple "hey I don't have any free time for this anymore" message and archiving the repository would have been just fine, but at least enabled people to fork it and continue it. Clearly this thread's existence shows people were using it as-is.
It's not like the Lemmy ecosystem is top notch, for a couple months Lemmy itself couldn't even render quotes and apostrophes properly and all posts looked like a mess of
'and"and</>>