Games

You seem to be a decent person based on the fact that you refused to cheat someone, so I'm going to try to reply to each point you made. First, they should NOT have deleted something you've paid for.

Bungie literally deleted content I paid for. They can get bent, they have lost myself and my money, among others, as customers permanently.

As of 2 years ago, Bungie became owned by Sony. The 2 guys who founded Bungie are no longer in charge. One of them left, and the other is basically a recluse, but who when we HAVE seen on camera, comes across as a guy who just likes making good games.

As you may or may not have seen in the headlines with Helldivers 2, SONY - a massive multi-billion dollar corporation (like Microsoft, EA, Activision, Ubisoft, etc.) are all perfectly capable of making self-destructive monumentally stupid business-centric decisions and in pursuit of boundless greed have hurt their own IP, their industry, and their customers. Sony LITERALLY deleted licenses for movies people paid for, so I'd be willing to wager this a similar call some idiot Sony exec made that was out of Bungie's hands.

And before you say "Who cares? They should have remained independent and not sold out to some big corporation then."

If you like big games, this is the current reality you will have to contend with. Bungie is not a tiny studio. The games they make require a literal ARMY to build. The logistical reality of that means that - for them to be able to afford to even just purchase the equipment needed to build and maintain such big games - let alone hire and pay people to work on them for something like 7-10 years at a time before having something "shippable" - they need MASSIVE backing. 10s if not 100s of millions of $ in investment. Even with some of the most successful game launches ever, if they plan on doing it bigger the next time, they need more than they earned to make the next game's investment back plus more.

The result of the company getting less money means people get let go. That's how business works.

Not really. A company firing workers has nothing to do with whether or not the company is "getting less money." A company does do whatever it thinks will make it the most money... Privately owned companies with decent owners - like Gabe Newell do want to make money, but also know their business is making things for people who like games... and he's personally invested in making the company do that well. And because Gabe isn't an asshole, turns out customers and most companies kinda like him and Valve and pretty much all their products. He also keeps good people, pays them well, and pretty much anyone working at Valve works there for the rest of their professional lives if they can.

HOWEVER... if the owner is an asshole who would, for completely random example, rather build himself a magic theater than provide his team members a decent salary and job security... or even worse... a company is publicly traded, their goal is to absolutely rocket the share price THAT QUARTER at ANY legally viable cost - even if it fucks them over long-term. So even if the publicly traded company made a billion dollars last quarter, if by firing 250 people they normally pay $50K a year, they make $1.00001 billion as a result and that makes the stock go up by $0.002... most CEOs will sign off on that. Hell, most CEOs would let their own children starve if it meant the share value went up by 5% that quarter.

Really a gigantic publicly-traded company letting people go has less to do with their success, and more to do with fiduciary responsibility to maximize share price each quarter.

Any person that keeps working with a company that actively harms its customers is not a person that I will support.

Objectively good take, though I also would suggest try to start from a point of empathy and assume no one LIKES working for an evil company (unless they're something like a hedge-fund management company or something kind of inherently exploitative - then maybe they're just an asshole).

My personal work ethic and integrity could never allow me to continue to work in such a dishonest place of work. I quit on the spot when one of my old bosses told me to lie and tell a customer that they needed parts replaced for their car that they didn’t need so he could charge them more.

Really awesome thing for you to do. Seriously, hats off to you for that.

Walked across the street and got a job at the competing shop the same day, and ended up getting paid more.

Ok... here's where you veer off a bit. Game dev studios are not car repair shops. There are literally only a HANDFUL of major game companies in the world. Look - here's an interactive map that shows pretty much EVERY major (and many minor) game company... in the WORLD.

Car repair shops - as you clearly even provided with your own example - are literally on every street corner. I have a feeling that - in addition to being a pretty stand-up dude - you must be pretty great at your job to be able to literally walk into some place to get immediately hired for more money, but the idea that any person working in the game industry can just immediately quit and find another job across the street as easily as that is unfortunately just not how reality works.

To become a game developer, most people will have to go to some sort of higher education institution... whether a dedicated trade-style game dev school or some prestigious engineering program at a major university. Many would need to take out some sort of loan to learn this BUT EVEN IF THEY DON'T (because I can see you typing "not my problem they took out money for something they couldn't afford")... yes, you can self-teach (much more so these days than in the past), but most people will need to learn via some sort of program designed to teach the trade. And even if you are lucky enough not to need any loans, many companies will ask you to move, have decent computer equipment to at least do the portfolio-type work needed to even convince a game company to give them an interview for the job they are applying for, or provide some sort of credentials that cost money to show you are certified to even get your resume even in the middle (let alone the top) of a pile.

All of this means financial risk. Less places to work means it might be hard to stay in the same city if your company fires you (unless you're in like Seattle, or San Francisco or New York - which is crazy expensive and makes people financially desperate on its own but that's a whole different discussion).

Anyway, I personally know guys who moved and bought houses to start a new job with a game company where that was the ONLY game company in a 3-state radius... and it closed within a month, throwing them into financial ruin. When there's financial risk for the workers, it's MUCH harder to stand up and say "hey don't do that" if you're worried that you're going to lose your job at the only shop in town.

If you are good at your job (as good as you seem to think all Bungie employees are), then finding another job will be easy.

Not necessarily... because you see - a SHIT-load of these companies are run by these fucking ghouls who have fired a collective of something like TENS OF THOUSANDS OF GAME DEV PROFESSIONALS over the past handful of years. These people didn't lose their job because they aren't talented. And neither did probably at least 25% (if we're being assholes and assuming a fuckton somehow aren't talented - which is asinine) of all the others who now those ex-Bungie folks will be competing with for LESS positions from the other companies who have cleaned house the past couple of years (again for no other reason than to artificially boost the share price of their publicly traded companies).

Sucks for the few good people that might work there, but if they get let go they will have the opportunity to work somewhere better. If they’re a good person, they will likely pick a place that doesn’t actively harm its own customers (and employees).

Yeah... I'm sure they all have a super long list of AAA game companies that aren't publicly traded or run increasingly by private equity firms that they can apply to that are MUCH more ethical and don't do things to actively harm their customers and employees.

Does any of what I'm rambling about here make sense?

You were wronged, my friend... and no one is trying to excuse that, but the issue is being caused by some assholes at the very top of ALL our favorite game companies... and basically saying "sucks to suck, if they're cool at their job, it's just as easy to find another as just walking across the street" to a bunch of lower-level people (who - again I can't stress this enough speaking as someone who WAS one of those types of people before I quit making games - just wanted to make a fun game that they could see people like you share about how much they loved playing it) because the suits did something shitty that no one thinks is good - is not really understanding the reason as to why it occurred, and what can be done as a consumer, voter, citizen to make it so this sort of shit doesn't happen anymore.