Concatenative Programming

145 readers

2 users here now

Hello!

This space is for sharing news, experiences, announcements, questions, showcases, etc. regarding concatenative programming concepts and tools.

We'll also take any programming described as:

pipelined
stack-oriented
tacit
postfix / reverse Polish notation (RPN)

From Wikipedia:

A concatenative programming language is a point-free computer programming language in which all expressions denote functions, and the juxtaposition of expressions denotes function composition. Concatenative programming replaces function application, which is common in other programming styles, with function composition as the default way to build subroutines.

For example, a sequence of operations in an applicative language like the following:

y = foo(x)
z = bar(y)
w = baz(z)

...is written in a concatenative language as a sequence of functions:

x foo bar baz

Active Languages

Let me know if I've got any of these misplaced!

Primarily Concatenative

Concatenative-ish, Chain-y, Pipe-y, Uniform Function Call Syntax, etc.

Cheat Sheets & Tutorials

Discord

IRC

#concatenative on irc.libera.chat

Wikis

concatenative wiki

Wikipedia Topics

Subreddits

GitHub Topics

Blogs

planet-factor

Practice

Codewars (Forth, Factor, Nim)
Advent of Code
Code Golf (Forth, Factor, Nim)
Project Euler
Exercism (Nim)
Perl Weekly Challenge

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

remokasu/stacker: command-line RPN calculator with an RPN-based scripting language (on PyPI) (github.com)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

it's uses standard lispy operator-operands order see https://learnxinyminutes.com/docs/hy

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So it looks like a totally different data flow style, and (I think) geared toward writing then running programs, whereas Stacker is more for interactive stack-oriented calculator tasks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

lisps are very repl-driven too

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I'd say an important part of this calculator's interaction model is doing something, getting a result, then doing something else to that result. That's not too bad in the regular Python interpreter either.

For example, in Python:

>>> 5
5
>>> 4 + _
9
>>> 2 * _
18

In Stacker:

>>> 5
[5]
>>> 4 +
[9]
>>> 2 *
[18]

Does Hy have something like the Python interpreter's _?