this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
144 points (96.8% liked)

Gaming

2580 readers
102 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The article states the taken down was sent to Garry Newman, so that would be his game studio face punch. Valve would not be included in this legal battle.

Edit: Before anyone says anything about valve assets I know, gmod is my favorite childhood/early teens game. Still they wouldn't be involved with this unless the dmca was sent to them.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I'm fully aware, I grew up the the game as well (well, TF2, but it was during the "golden years" of Valve and source-based multiplayer games). That doesn't mean Garry Newman can't send them a copy of the dmca for them to include in their C&D. I honestly want to see Valve do it, regardless of whether the original dmca is legit, because it'd bring a lot of attention to false-dmcas. The reason why I'm not saying that Garry should do it is because, well, the assets are actually Valve's, not Garry's, and I'm not sure if Garry actually has an explicit license to use them and as such, would not be in a position to "fight fire with fire" himself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I though Gmod did not come with many assets, but instead used what you had locally on your computer in other source games?