this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
614 points (93.4% liked)

Nature Enthusiasts

799 readers
13 users here now

For all media, news and discussion focusing on nature!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

1-No advertising or spam.

2-No harrassment of any kind.

3-No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

founded 1 year ago
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, the actual permanent solution would have been to not unearth all that fossil fuel in the first place. The second-best solution is to bind it in trees.

We could try cutting down trees and burying them underground without (much) oxygen. But just having more trees alive at a time is a lot less effort.

[–] SchmidtGenetics 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Burying it does what? It still decays and releases the co2 eventually. All you would be doing is making it future generations problem, like what we’ve always been doing, so maybe we need to do so thing different…?

Do you not think that’s been thought of and deemed not viable?